HomeWeaponsChemical weaponsGlobal Centre for the Responsibility to Protect: UN Security Council Vetoes are...

Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect: UN Security Council Vetoes are Normalizing Chemical Warfare


The UN Secretary General Report on Children and Armed Conflict Doesn't Accurately Reflect the Atrocious Reality in Syria

By: Picture-alliance/Zuma Press.

Yesterday, 16 November, for the tenth time since Syria’s civil war began, Russia vetoed a draft resolution at the UN Security Council aimed at holding perpetrators of mass atrocities accountable. The vetoed resolution would have renewed the mandate of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Joint Investigative Mechanism (OPCW-JIM), established to identify those responsible for chemical weapons attacks in Syria.
Today, 17 November, Russia also vetoed a technical rollover resolution that would have extended the OPCW-JIM’s mandate for another month and given Council members more time to negotiate the OPCW-JIM’s future. Russian diplomats have tried to present this as a debate about the OPCW-JIM’s technical merits. However, what is at stake is not just the OPCW-JIM, but the gradual normalization of chemical warfare.
The prohibition of chemical weapons is one of the oldest norms of the international community, dating back to 1899. The Geneva Protocol of 1925 reinforced their illegality under international law. This was further strengthened by the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention of which 192 states, including every current member of the UN Security Council except Egypt, is a signatory.
Although chemical weapons remain inherently immoral, indiscriminate and illegal, there have been scores of attacks in Syria since 2013. The main target and the principal victims of these attacks have been civilians. In response, and in a rare moment of unity, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2235 in August 2015 and established the OPCW-JIM.
Subsequent investigations by the OPCW-JIM have found that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons on four occasions since 2013, while the so-called Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) has used them twice. The latest OPCW-JIM report found that the Syrian government was responsible for the use of sarin during a 4 April 2017 attack on the town of Khan Shaykhun. The report also found the ISIL responsible for an attack on Umm Hawsh on 15 and 16 September 2016, where sulfur mustard gas was used. All of these chemical weapons attacks constitute war crimes.

To view the original statement on the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect website
View full Statement


Latest Articles

Related articles

A Joint Statement from Syrian Civil Society Organisations to Expedite the Trial of Rifaat al-Assad

Languages Available In English عربي   On 11 March 2024, the Swiss Attorney General submitted an indictment to the Federal...

Cyberattacks on SNHR Website Repelled by Our IT Team

Cyberattacks on Our Website are an Almost Daily Occurrence, yet the Latest Attack Was Exceptionally Ferocious Languages Available In ...

SNHR Shares Data on Thousands of Forcibly Disappeared Persons With the OHCHR

Languages Available In English عربي   The Hague – The Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR): As part of an ongoing...

Invitation: The Devastating Effects of Humanitarian Aid Cuts in Syria: Challenges and Strategies to Mitigate...

 A Brussel VIII Conference 2024 Side-Event Languages Available In English عربي   The Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR), in collaboration...