Available in:
The destruction of bridges in Raqqa by the Syrian Democratic Forces raises serious legal and humanitarian concerns. Under international humanitarian law, bridges are considered civilian structures in principle and may only be targeted if they constitute a legitimate military objective and the attack is carried out with due necessity, proportionality, and feasible precautions.
Destroying bridges during a withdrawal is not a neutral tactic; it inflicts severe harm on civilians by cutting off access to hospitals and essential services, impeding safe movement, and prolonging displacement. In the absence of compelling military necessity and proportionality, such acts may constitute unlawful destruction of civilian property and give rise to individual criminal liability.
Civilian infrastructure is protected and must not be treated as a disposable commodity.
