Opinion

Available in: English العربية Fadel Abdulghany Recognizing minority rights within constitutional frameworks is a fundamental pillar for establishing political legitimacy and strengthening social cohesion in pluralistic societies....

Available in: English العربية Fadel Abdulghany The death of Rifaat al-Assad on January 21, 2026, in the United Arab Emirates at the age of 88, marks a pivotal moment in the pursuit of accountability for those responsible for one of the most horrific mass atrocities in modern Middle Eastern history. As the former Syrian vice president and one of the key architects of the 1982 Hama massacre, his death before facing Syrian justice exemplifies the complete entrenchment of impunity at the national level. This is not a biological accident, but rather the result of a systematic policy pursued by Hafez al-Assad's regime to protect the pillars of institutionalized violence, including Rifaat himself, by providing political and security cover for operations carried out with direct coordination and under the supervision of the highest levels of power, over a period of more than a month. While death closes the door to the direct criminal prosecution of the deceased, it does not preclude broader forms of accountability that operate independently of the accused's continued existence, nor does it eliminate the possibility of asset recovery or holding accountable the networks that facilitated the crime or profited from its proceeds.    Limits of Prosecution and Universal Jurisdiction  Rifaat al-Assad faced charges in three major jurisdictions, but none resulted in a full trial in the procedural sense.  Switzerland's move to apply the principle of universal jurisdiction, which allows for the prosecution of perpetrators of the most serious international crimes regardless of where they were committed or the nationality of the perpetrator or victims, marked a significant development when the Swiss Attorney General's Office indicted Rifaat in March 2024 for war crimes and crimes against humanity related to the events in Hama. The indictment included allegations of his responsibility for ordering killings, torture, cruel treatment, and arbitrary detention, placing him among the highest-ranking officials accused of such crimes who have been prosecuted under the principle of universal jurisdiction.  However, Swiss...

Available in: English العربية Fadel Abdulghany How modern states can accommodate ethnic and linguistic diversity while maintaining national cohesion is one of the most persistent challenges in...

Available in: English العربية Fadel Abdulghany The recruitment of children in armed conflicts is considered one of the most serious violations under international humanitarian law...

Available in: English العربية Fadel Abdulghany The question of the legal status of the Golan Heights under international law is a prime example of how...

Available in: English العربية The New York Times investigative report, "Inside Assad's Conspiracy to Cover Up Crimes," is one of the most prominent investigations into...

Available in: English العربية Fadel Abdulghany The tension surrounding the disclosure of perpetrators' identities stems from a conflict between ethical and legal principles of equal...

Available in: English العربية Fadel Abdulghany The transition from authoritarian rule to a pluralistic political system is incomplete without rebuilding the symbolic foundations upon which the...

Available in: English العربية Fadel Abdulghany The practice of arbitrarily detaining foreigners and dual nationals to extract political, economic, or diplomatic concessions from states is one...

Available in: English العربية Fadel Abdulghany Creating a national anthem during political transitions is a crucial task that goes beyond simply composing music and lyrics....