HomeThematic ReportsOthersThe Most Notable Violations in Idlib Governorate

The Most Notable Violations in Idlib Governorate

Share

“Blood-Soaked Olives”

Violations in Idlib Governorate

I- Introduction:
Idlib governorate was subjected to a number of attacks and a systemized destruction policy that was not restricted to front lines or battlefields alone. Based on our daily documentation, we noticed that most of the attacks were on vital facilities and densely populated neighborhoods, tens of kilometers away from battle fields. Therefore, the rate of civilian victims was alarming compared to that of gunmen. Syrians welcomed UNSC resolution 2139 that was issued on 22 February 2014 which stated that “all parties have to immediately cease all attacks against civilians, as well as the indiscriminate employment of weapons in populated areas, including shelling and aerial bombardment, such as the use of barrel bombs.” Nonetheless, government forces did not cease its operations or its attacks against civilians.

SNHR previously issued special studies and reports about government’s use of barrel bombs before and after the resolution was issued. Shelling, killing and displacing residents is a systemized policy that aims mainly to hinder the establishment of any authoritative body that would replace the ruling regime.
SNHR has consistently tried to differentiate between crimes committed by different parties involved in the Syrian conflict. We found that government forces committed the greatest rate of crimes and violations against civilians compared to other conflict parties. However, media outlets and international organizations focus on ISIL’s crimes and tend to neglect the crimes committed by government forces and parties supportive to it; knowingly that air force is one of the deadliest weapons used and owned only by government forces.

SNHR relies on a network of members and local activists, in all Syrian governorates, in gathering data and issuing reports since 2011. The documentation team validates the images and videos we receive then cross-reference it with victims’ testimonies. SNHR confirms, through its investigations, that there were no military facilities next to any of the regions that were shelled by government forces, and therefore, it should justify its actions whether it was deliberate (like using rocket launchers), or random (like using barrel bombs) before international courts of justice. Nonetheless, government forces deny all these accusations, ignore all correspondence, accuse Al Qaeda and terrorists of perpetrating these crimes, and prevent independent international committees from conducting investigations inside Syria.

full pdf report

Subscribe

Latest Articles

Related articles

On World Refugee Day: Growing International Focus on the Return of Syrian Refugees amid the...

Since December 8, 2024 and up to the end of the first quarter of 2026, more than...

The Syrian Network for Human Rights Calls for Disclosing the Fate of Thousands of Syrian...

The Syrian Democratic Forces transferred no fewer than 6,547 detainees to Iraq, among them 4,743 Syrians, including...

Criminal Accountability in Syria: A Legal Analysis of the Litigation Procedures and the Indictment Decision...

An Analytical Study on the Legal Structure of Criminalization, Modes of Responsibility, and Trial Guarantees in Syrian...

Reintegrating and Reforming Armed Groups in Transitional Phase in Syria: Pathways to Sustainable Stability

Available in: English العربية Damascus — The Syrian Network for Human Rights today issued a report titled “Reintegration...